College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Gendered Violence and the Media

Published: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Students of Professor Clayton Michaels’ class about a feminist approach to comic books got a rare treat on Monday March 1: a professor from St. Mary’s College as a guest lecturer.

Professor Terri Russ of St. Mary’s communication studies department gave a lecture titled “The Bitch Deserved It: Deconstructing Gendered Violence.”

Identifying herself as a feminist since early childhood, Russ studies gendered violence due to her experience of using “urban self-defense,” a series of behaviors that women use to keep themselves safe when in the city at night.

“As a city woman, you know all these techniques,” said Russ. “For example, always parking under a streetlight, even if you have to walk farther, first checking under your car, then in the backseat to make sure no one is hiding there waiting for you. And it’s really problematic that women feel like we have to do these things.”

Russ became interested in the issue of gendered violence due to an incident that happened when she was in law school.

“A friend showed up in tears, her boyfriend of three months had date raped her,” said Russ. “They had been out for their three month anniversary and he said that three months equaled a blow job and she said no. Instead, he took more.”

After tipping off the emergency room staff to the fact that the man who had raped her friend was the same man that was in the waiting room, Russ began to study how the media insinuates the thought that violence against women is okay in society.

In her presentation, Russ highlighted how the concentric circles of violence feed each other, moving from the personal violence in the home to the overall societal problem of accepted violence through a pervasive fear that permeates male/female interactions and leads not only to violence, but to a disinclination to report acts of violence.

A further problem is a lack of sympathetic ears. When Russ worked at a university in Virginia, she became part of a committee that made recommendations about sexual harassment policy and handled complaints. In the first two months of the committee’s existence, it handled 11 cases, but took no action, which angered Russ.

Her presentation included lists of rape facts and myths, such as the myth that rape is motivated by sexual urges, and the fact that most rapes are committed by people whom the victim knows. Also, only 2% of reported rapes are false reports.

Russ also touched on the fact that victims of violence often question themselves asking if the violence directed against them was their fault, and how families become stuck in a cycle of violence.

“Stage one is tension, where some incident no matter how small sets the abuser off,” said Russ. “Stage two is explosion, where the violence occurs, and in each cycle the type of violence escalates. Stage three is remorse, where the abuser protests that it will never happen again. Stage four is the honeymoon period where everything goes well, but tension builds, leading back to stage one.”

Connected to all this is how the media participates in “normalization” of violence. Russ included information from the 2000 census that shows 98% of homes have one television set, and over 70% have two or more.

Using magazine advertisements, Russ’ students divided the images into two categories, women with the look of death, and women as the victim of attack. With these images saturating our consciousness, the audience becomes programmed to accept these as a standard of feminine beauty.

“Media images are fragments of a cultural Zeitgeist—we’re fascinated with them and we identify with them,” said Russ.

Russ is in the process of organizing a conference on beauty called the Bold Beauty Conference, to be held at St. Mary’s on April 26. Interested students should send an e-mail to truss@saintmarys.edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments

Pierce Harlan
Tue Mar 9 2010 22:14
"Also, only 2% of reported rapes are false reports." This is wrong. I run the world's leading site dedicated to giving voice to persons falsely accused of rape, The False Rape Society. Apparently the speakers are under the mistaken notion that in order to raise awareness about rape and to lend credibility to rape accusers, you need to denigrate the victimization of the falsely accused by declaring false rape claims essentially non-existent. The fact is, you can, and should, abhor both rape and false rerporting without resorting to knee jerk distortions of indisputable facts.

See, e.g., E. Greer, The Truth Behind Legal Dominance Feminism's 'Two Percent False Rape Claim' Figure, 33 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 947, a scholarly law review article that traced the two percent false rape canard to its untrustworthy source. Yet that two percent lie is still cited by paid sexual assault counselors. See also, "Until Proven Innocent," the widely praised (praised even by the New York Times, which the book skewers -- as well as almost every other major U.S. news source) and painstaking study of the Duke Lacrosse non-rape case. Authors Stuart Taylor and Professor K.C. Johnson explain that the exact number of false claims is elusive but "[t]he standard assertion by feminists that only 2 percent" or sexual assault claims "are false, which traces to Susan Brownmiller's 1975 book 'Against Our Will,' is without empirical foundation and belied by a wealth of empirical data. These data suggest that at least 9 percent and probably closer to half" of all sexual assault claims "are false . . . ." (Page 374.)

For most rape claims, we honestly don't know what happened. We would have to evaluate the evidence in a case-by-case basis to know, and nobody does that. We know that about 15 percent of these claims end in conviction and we can be reasonably certain most of these were actual rapes despite the fact that some men and boys are wrongly convicted. We know that anywhere from 8 to 50 percent are "false," not just unfounded, depending on the study. Most fall in the ambiguous gray where we just don't know what happened. It is fair to assert that more rapes are committed than lead to conviction and that more false claims occur than we can say with certainty. But rape/false rape claims do not lend themselves to certainty. To suggest certainty that 98% of all rape claims are actual rapes is simply wrong by any measure.

Whatever the exact number, every impartial, objective study shows false rape claims are a significant problem. As reported by "False Rape Allegations" by Eugene Kanin, Archives of Sexual Behavior Feb 1994 v23 n1 p81(12), Professor Kanin’s landmark study of a mid-size Midwestern city over the course of nine years found that 41 percent of all rape claims were not just false but recanted. The percentage of false claims was likely higher. Kanin also studied the police records of two unnamed large state universities and found that in three years, 50 percent of the 64 rapes reported to campus police were determined to be false.” Kanin was a feminist icon, widely cited for his studies on male aggression, but after people like me started citing this landmark study, he became a nitwit, incapable of doing simple research. Go figure.

In addition, a massive Air Force study in 1985 studied 556 rape allegations. It found that 27% of the accusers recanted, and an independent evaluation revealed a false accusation rate of 60%. McDowell, Charles P., Ph.D. “False Allegations.” Forensic Science Digest, (publication of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations), Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 1985), p. 64.

Some of strongest supporters of my site are rape victims. They loathe and despise false accusers. If you really want to help rape victims, you will work to eradicate the false accusers instead of putting your head in the sand and pretending they are a myth. They are hurting rape victims' credibility while well-intentioned rape advocates tell people, "look the other way, nothing to see here."

Does the above in any manner diminish the awfulness of rape? Absolutely not. The point is, we can all work to combat both rape and false reporting without slinking into divisive gender politics or the ideological trivialization of false reporting just because its primary victims are men.

PIERCE HARLAN
False Rape Society







log out